March 8, 2017

Kubernetes vs. Docker: Comparing Containerization Platforms

When comparing Kubernetes vs. Docker, you really need to define what your team hopes to achieve with a container-building tool. Both of these tools provide extensive capabilities to build virtual containers at scale, but the ways they go about it differ significantly.

ALSO READ: Puppet vs. Chef: Comparing Configuration Management Tools

Kubernetes is an open source container storage program built by teams at Google and bases its container-worldview on how Google develops within their walls in Mountain View. While it provides a useful, scalable, and powerful tool, Kubernetes also gets a lot of clout because it’s an intricate and sometimes overly-complicated system. If you want an example of the power of Kubernetes, look no further than last year’s launch of the Pokemon Go app. While there were troubles, that app is a prime example of the ability of Kubernetes (and containers) to scale rapidly. 

Docker is a flexible container storage platform that takes usability into account, which should be expected for a consumer-focused product. While you can access and learn Docker for free with the community version, you can also purchase Enterprise subscriptions that come with their own perks.

Comparing Kubernetes vs. Docker really comes down to comparing Kubernetes to Docker’s Swarm product, which is still in beta. New subscribers to Docker have immediate access the Swarm features, while legacy versions require a quick toggle switch to turn it on.

Set Up and Installation

Kubernetes vs. Docker

One of the main complaints users have about Kubernetes is that it uses a different setup for each OS. You can use the Kubernetes’ online resources to help you configure your workspace, but you should also prepare yourself to do plenty of googling to build custom environments that break from the standard implementation. Setting Kubernetes up takes a lot of planning, too, as you’ll need to define your nodes before you get started. Add to that some manual integrations, and the installation of Kubernetes can feel like a mammoth task.

Docker Swarm uses the docker CLI to run all portions of its programs. With Docker you’ll only need to learn that one set of tools to build your environments and configurations. Because the Swarm program runs on your current Docker, there’s almost no setup other than opting into the Swarm beta. From there, you can build your containers via commands as they arise, in contrast to how Kubernetes requires you to map out your clusters before you even begin.

Working in the Two Systems

Kubernetes can run on top of Docker but requires you to know the common language infrastructure (CLI) for both. You must know your docker CLI to navigate within that structure, and then the supplemental Kubernetes CLI to run those programs. Have several developers running the containers throughout your network? They should become familiar with the Kubernetes CLI if they want to get anything done in those clusters.

Docker Swarm will feel much like working in other Docker tools (like Compose). You’ll use the same CLI, and you can even spin up new containers with a single command. The speed and variability of this tool, along with its easy-to-use command structure gives Docker the usability edge. Whereas Kubernetes can feel like reinventing the wheel, Docker allows for speed. The major detraction from working in Docker? If you want to perform a function and can’t based on the current API, you’re stuck.

Logging and Monitoring

Kubernetes vs. Docker: Docker Swarm networking

Kubernetes supports several versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster:

  • Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK) logs within the container
  • Heapster/Grafana/Influx for monitoring in the container
  • Sysdig cloud integration

On the other hand, Docker only supports monitoring with third-party applications. Docker recommends using Reimann for monitoring, but the open API makes connecting with lots of apps easy. Docker logs can be shipped via ELK within the cluster as well.

Size Matters

The size and number of the containers you could spin used to define the difference in the choice between Kubernetes vs. Docker, but release of recent Docker updates has significantly closed the gap. Both systems now support 1,000 node clusters and up to 30,000 containers. Kubernetes may be somewhat difficult to get going, but once running, it boasts that 99 percent of API calls respond within one second. Once you spin up those containers, you have more flexibility around what you can do with them, too.

Docker reported on an independent test of Kubernetes vs. Docker in March of 2016. The study found that Docker could spin up the same number of containers five times faster than Kubernetes. This is largely due to the complexity of the Kubernetes tool.

Conclusions

Kubernetes vs. Docker is not an easy comparison. The elitist in me fights the former customer support agent: one wants to recommend the technology that has cooler roots and capabilities, while the other just wants things to work. In this case, that customer support agent wins, and I have to recommend Docker. Other than very specialized cases (an overnight smash success app like Pokemon Go, perhaps) Docker’s ease of use and installation beats having to learn and use new commands for a limited bump in capabilities.

To learn more about containerization and related products, check out our mobile device management Product Selection Tool. 

Looking for software? Try our Product Selection Tool